New test people got the common level of studies towards HPV off thirteen.six +/? 2.0 (95% CI 13.2–thirteen.9) towards the a scale from 20. There are significant variations in studies with respect to the level of studies (You = 425.5; p = 0.004). Records knowledge on the HPV try large on class with a high school-college degree compared to elementary-zero education. No variations in studies was in fact located on account of age (U = 1442.0; p = 0.150) otherwise marital standing (You = 1450.0; p = 0.122).

The fresh new volume from issues predicated on HPV strain was revealed for the Figure 2A. Of full take to society, 65.0% was indeed recognized as HPV confident having 49.1% of populace known getting contaminated with a high-exposure HPV. Into the set of patients with HPV, 75.6% out of bacterial infections corresponded to help you a premier-risk genotype and you can 74.3% of one’s customers was understood for coinfections that have several HPV challenges (forty-eight.3% away from complete take to people). Particular coinfected female showed to 8 more genotypes.

The remaining variables incorporated: the age from which brand new new member turned sexually energetic (X 2 = step italyan arkadaЕџlД±k uygulamasД± Гјcretsiz three,234; p = 0

Figure dos. (A) Regularity studies regarding HPV infection in women considering degree of exposure, Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120 lr (lower chance)-HPV six, eleven, 42, 43, 49, 81 (CP8304). ir (undetermined risk)-HPV 26, 34, forty, 54, 55, 57, 61, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 82, 83, 84. hours (high-risk)-HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, forty five, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68. (B) Volume data out-of HPV infection in women centered on decades; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120. (C) Volume studies out of hour HPV genotypes in women; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120.

Whilst groups of feminine aged 56–65 and you may 29–45 years old had increased ratio out of HPV bacterial infections (Contour 2B), the fresh new Z shot testing for ratio was struggling to present extreme differences when considering age range (p > 0.050). There is certainly no relationship anywhere between age range and HPV problems (X dos = dos.746; p = 0.432).

This new regularity distribution of one’s hrHPV strains are found inside the Contour 2C. The most common genotype try hrHPV 18, followed closely by genotypes 52, 66, thirty-five, and you may 51 (X dos = eight.234; p = 0.041). HPV 16 got a decreased frequency away from infection on the classification read.

step three.dos. Acting out of HPV infection

Table 2. HPV problems based on Parity, Cigarette practices, Amount of sexual partners, Birth prevention and you may Immunosuppression episodes in women of Cuenca Ecuador, 2019.

If you’re overall no connection try discovered anywhere between HPV problems and you will condom have fun with, when bookkeeping to possess marital updates, players who have been unmarried or even in common law unions, condom explore was in the down infectivity (Fisher’s X 2 = 5.852; p = 0.026; V Cramer = ? 0.293; p = 0.016). To own hitched women, that it association was not located (X 2 = 1.231; p = 0.412).

357), knowledge about HPV (X dos = 0.261; p = 0.610), gynecological medical care (X 2 = 0.141; p = 0.708), host to home (X 2 = 0.369; p = 0.562), education level (X dos = 0.188; p = 0.664), alcohol consumption (X dos = 0.669; p = 0.413), age groups (X 2 = dos.033; p = 0.362), previous STIs (X 2 = step 1.553; p = 0.276), regularity away from sexual intercourse (X 2 = 0.701; p = 0.441), and marital position (X 2 = 1.528; p = 0.250). They were perhaps not with the HPV infection from the attempt studied.

Digital logistic regression confirmed an association anywhere between parity, immunosuppression symptoms, entry to oral contraceptives/IUDs, and you will positive HPV infection. Other parameters was basically omitted the help of its lowest analytical relevance (p > 0.050) otherwise lowest predictive strength having a non-extreme Otherwise. Zero confounding otherwise communication variables was discovered. The features of the design received because of the digital logistic regression is shown in Dining table step 3.