Re: ? Comyn spouse off Malise

Concerning the Comyn child who was partner out-of Malise regarding Strathearn, I had theorized when you look at the 2005 one she was indeed Margaret, defined as wife off Sir John de- Keith (get a hold of backup from post lower than) who was 2ndly e are provided where article: new wife Emma I suggest was of another family unit members, and never mom of your next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , states to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl from Strathearn, had a spouse Emma, into the 1261-1267, whose surname try not familiar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. of Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. sometime in advance of 1270, so as that his widow (Margaret) could have been «available» a while once Emma.

This was of course a conjecture; it can have the benefit of handling a well-known matchmaking anywhere between Muriel Keith and you will Reginald ce Cheyne. Any more relevant papers perform naturally feel desired.

Brand new membership when you look at the Scots Peerage in regards to the category of Keith claims of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he are said to keeps married Comyn, earl out of Buchan . So it character, of your own undecided («believed to was indeed») range, can now be corrected based on the following dispensation, dated in the Fondi for the fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 On bishop out of Moray. Faculty so you can distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, of Moray and you can Aberdeen dioceses, regarding impediment so you can marriage as a result of the 3rd and fourth levels of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long run 2nd spouse out of Robert Stewart, very first Duke out of Albany (d. 1420), try contracted so you can marry Reginald ce Cheyne, child out of Sir Reginald le are Anaheim, CA women easy to pick up Cheyne of the their wife (since the their basic partner), Helen regarding Strathearn. Whenever you are there are celebrated gaps on the origins out-of Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald le Cheyne do show an origin in the Comyns. Although not, this will be too distant to require a dispensation in the event that Muriel try a good-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1233), which would end up being the circumstances when the is the reason child.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne try good-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn, daughter out-of Alexander Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1290), young man regarding William Comyn in the above list. Their own young man are Malise, Earl of Strathearn off 1312 to their death for the 1328 , and daddy from Reginald.

ca. 1270), try identical to Marjory Comyn, and you will partnered 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl away from Strathearn (d. 1312). This would imply the fresh parentage a€?believed to has been’ that Margaret, wife of Sir John de- Keith, are from one age group: she’d not have come brand new d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but alternatively of his young man Alexander. There isn’t any facts that Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn was hitched far prior to 1275: as Lindsay authored,

There clearly was one discernable base about what the relationship ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith could have stayed: in the event the Margaret Comyn, partner away from Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ New partner associated with the earl, regarding the 1275, are called Marjory, while we understand the attesting condition regarding No. cv., and is stated because of the Wyntoun, Book VIII. guy. vi., to possess been the next brother regarding John Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, which discussed with respect to Earl Malise the wedding settlement significantly more than stated [old on London, April 26, 1293 getting their daughter Matilda and Robert de- Tony, young buck from Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de Quincy E off Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als We Age from Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We I We We We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de Keith E out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ We We I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E regarding Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I le Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V I We de- Graham Sir William de- I We__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We We III I We I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke of Albany)